My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
University of Colorado Law Review Volume 55 Issue 3 Spring 1984
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
University of Colorado Law Review Volume 55 Issue 3 Spring 1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2014 2:36:04 PM
Creation date
11/28/2014 2:36:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Description
Plans and Studies: The Recent Quest for a Utopia in the Utilization of Colorado's Water Resources
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
402 UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO LAW REVIEW [Vol. 55 <br /> II. POST-1970 RESTRAINTS ON WATER DEVELOPMENT <br /> The financial and regulatory restraints on water development <br /> since 1970 are well known and have been frequently commented <br /> on.74 Only some highlights will be reviewed here. <br /> In March 1971, the Bureau of Reclamation and Colorado <br /> Water Conservation Board jointly issued a plan of study for a Colo- <br /> rado State Water Plan pursuant to the Water Resources Planning <br /> Act.76 A Phase I Appraisal Report and Phase II Report on Legal <br /> and Institutional Considerations were issued in February and August <br /> of 1974, respectively." <br /> At about this time, a Report to Governor John Love on Certain <br /> Colorado Water Law Problems was prepared and widely commented <br /> on for its discussion of the state role in affecting the use of water.77 <br /> Almost simultaneously, the National Water Commission issued a <br /> Review Draft — Proposed Report", followed the next year by the <br /> Commission's final report entitled Water Policies for the Future." <br /> All of these reports, which will be discussed in more detail later, <br /> squarely confronted government's role at the federal and state levels <br /> in allocating water resources. They presented the changes then oc- <br /> curring in the development of water resources. The entrepreneurial <br /> system of acquiring and using water, particularly the federal govern- <br /> ment's role in this system, was being subjected to intense scrutiny at <br /> the very time the post 1970 restraints were being implemented. With <br /> few exceptions, the plans and studies were not driving the changes; <br /> for the most part they were trying to understand and interpret them. <br /> A. The Availibility of Capital <br /> In the previous section it was shown how Colorado, for many <br /> years, had relied on the federal government for capital to develop its <br /> water resources, except for wells and municipal water that water <br /> 74. See, e.g., White, The Emerging Relationship Between Environmental Regulations <br /> and Colorado Water Law, 53 U. Cow. L. REV. 597 (1982). <br /> 75. U.S. DEP'T OF INTERIOR AND STATE OF COLORADO, WATER FOR TOMORROW, <br /> COLO. STATE WATER PLAN, PLAN OF STUDY (March 1971). <br /> 76. U.S. DEP'T OF INTERIOR AND STATE OF COLORADO, WATER FOR TOMORROW, <br /> COLO. STATE WATER PLAN, PHASE I, APPRAISAL REPORT (February 1974);REPORT ON LE- <br /> GAL AND INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS, PHASE II (August 1974). <br /> 77. Carlson, supra note 24. <br /> 78. II C. Luce, H. Appling, I. Ellis, R. Ernst, R. Linsley, J. Murphy and J. Wheat, <br /> Review Draft—Proposed Report of the National Water Commission (November 1972). <br /> 79. NATIONAL WATER COMM'N, WATER POLICIES FOR THE FUTURE, FINAL REPORT TO <br /> THE PRESIDENT AND THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES BY THE NATIONAL WATER COM- <br /> MISSION (June 1973). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.