Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> Mr. Stapleton then asked Mr. Ioannides to brief the Board on the <br /> proposed Morrison Project. Mr. Ioannides reported that the total <br /> estimated cost of the project is about $700 ,000, with the staff <br /> recommending that $350 ,000 of this amount be financed from the con- <br /> struction fund at a service rate of 4 percent. Mr. Stapleton then <br /> called upon Mr. Rolf Paul to speak on behalf of Morrison about the <br /> proposed project. After a brief exchange between Mr. Paul and members <br /> of the Board over a few particulars of the project, Mr. Vandemoer <br /> moved, seconded by Mr. Getz, that the Board accept the staff's rec- <br /> ommendation for this project. There being no further discussion, the <br /> motion was passed on a unanimous voice vote. <br /> Mr. McDonald then presented the proposed Meadow Creek Project to <br /> the Board noting that the staff recommended approval of the project <br /> contingent upon two specific conditions . First, the staff recommended <br /> that written assurances be received from the local sponsoring entity <br /> that they will be willing to repay the project even if the benefit- <br /> cost ratio for the project is less than 1. Secondly, the staff <br /> recommended that approval of the project be made contingent upon <br /> approval by the staff of all of the foundation work which was pre- <br /> viously completed by the local sponsoring entity using its own <br /> financial resources and approval by the staff of the drawings and <br /> specifications for the completion of the project. Mr. McDonald also <br /> noted that the matter of the U. S . Supreme Court decree in Wyoming <br /> versus Nebraska had been taken into account insofar as the proposed <br /> project would lead to more storage in the North Platte River system <br /> and the staff had satisfied itself that there were no legal problems <br /> in this regard. The chair then recognized Mr. Pete Bailer, repre- <br /> senting Bailer Livestock Company, which is the entity donating land <br /> for the project. Mr. Bailer briefly addressed himself to the project <br /> and responded to several questions from Board members about the <br /> recreational features of the proposed project and public access to <br /> the project across the Bailer lands . There being no further discussion , <br /> Mr. Furneau moved, seconded by Mr. Gormley, that the Board recommend <br /> to the Legislature that the State participate in the proposed project <br /> in the amount of $1 million subject to contingencies outlined above . <br /> The motion passed on a unanimous voice vote, Mr. Sherman having <br /> participated in that vote after joining the meeting midway through <br /> the discussion on the proposed Meadow Creek Project. <br /> Mr. Stapleton then moved, seconded by Mr. Jackson, that the <br /> prioritization of the projects for presentation to the Legislature be <br /> established in the order in which the proposed projects were taken up <br /> by the Board. There being no discussion, the motion was passed on a <br /> unanimous voice vote . Summaries of the projects as presented to the <br /> Board are attached. <br /> -10- <br />