Laserfiche WebLink
• 1. concern for potential conflicts between the <br /> administration of the Act and the exercise of water <br /> rights under state law and the allocations of water <br /> made by interstate compact or judicial decree; <br /> 2 . support for the on-going efforts to find administrative <br /> solutions to these conflicts in the Upper Colorado <br /> River and Platte River Basins; <br /> 3 . support for seeking committee report language which <br /> would recognize and confirm the appropriateness of <br /> these efforts and would direct the Fish and Wildlife <br /> Service to report back to Congress on the results; <br /> 4 . support for limiting reauthorization of the Act to as <br /> few years as possible; and <br /> 5 . support for several substantive amendments to the Act. <br /> Based on action taken by the Board at the March, 1985, <br /> meeting, Mr . McDonald prepared written testimony for <br /> presentation at the House and Senate subcommittee hearing. <br /> Principal elements of the statement included: (1) a specific <br /> request that reauthorization of the Act be for only two years, <br /> and (2) no request for any substantive amendments to the Act. <br /> Following Board discussion, Mr . Smith moved, seconded by <br /> Mr . Covert, that the Board (1) affirm for the record, the <br /> written statement submitted by Mr . McDonald for the House and <br /> Senate hearings, and (2) directed Mr . McDonald to actively <br /> follow this legislation and to take such steps as he deems <br /> necessary, in his discretion, to obtain the most favorable <br /> legislation and committee reports for Colorado water users . <br /> (A copy of the written statement is attached to Appendix <br /> D. ) <br /> Agenda Item 10 - Division of Wildlife Threatened and Endangered <br /> Species Program (Appendix E) <br /> Mr . McDonald prepared a memorandum for this agenda item <br /> which was distributed to the Board in advance. Mr . McDonald <br /> introduced Eddie Kochman, Chief of Fisheries Management for the <br /> Division of Wildlife, to discuss this item. Mr . Kochman <br /> provided a brief updated overview of the state ' s program. He <br /> highlighted the statutory consultation process, which involves <br /> water users among others, and noted that 160 notices were sent <br /> out to various recent meetings; and that subsequently the <br /> February 14, 1985, General Provision Regulations were adopted. <br /> He also noted that three fish were added to the threatened list <br /> and one bird and five fish were removed. <br /> • <br /> -7- <br />