My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board Meeting 05/03/1985
CWCB
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
Board Meeting 05/03/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2014 2:35:54 PM
Creation date
11/28/2014 2:35:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/3/1985
Description
Minutes, Agenda, Memorandums May 3, 1985
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
APPENDIX DSTATE OF COLORADO <br /> COLORADO WATER CONSERVATION BOARD <br /> . Department of Natural Resources <br /> 721 State Centennial Building , •i <br /> 1313 Sherman Street <br /> Denver,Colorado 80203 <br /> Phone: (303) 866-3441 <br /> Richard D.Lamm <br /> Governor <br /> J.William McDonald <br /> Director <br /> M E M O R A N D U M David W.Walker <br /> Deputy Director <br /> TO Members, CWCB <br /> FROM: Bill McDonald <br /> DATE: April 24, 1985 <br /> SUBJECT: Agenda Item 9c, May 3 , 1985, Board Meeting-- <br /> Reauthorization of the Endangered Species Act <br /> Introduction <br /> Bills authorizing the Endangered Species Act for periods of <br /> four or five years have been introduced in the House (H.R. 1027) <br /> and the Senate (S. 725) , respectively. Neither bill provides for <br /> . substantive amendments to the Act. Hearings were held in the <br /> House in mid-March and in the Senate on April 16 and 18. <br /> Indications are that both the House and Senate subcommittees of <br /> jurisdiction will seek to mark-up their respective bills during <br /> May. <br /> Discussion <br /> At its March meeting, the Board outlined its position on the <br /> reauthorization of the Act and directed me to submit testimony on <br /> its behalf at any Congressional hearings . There were five <br /> elements to the Board 's position: <br /> (1) concern for potential conflicts between the <br /> administration of the Act and the exercise of water <br /> rights under state law and the allocations of water <br /> made by interstate compact or judicial decree; <br /> ( 2) support for the on-going efforts to find administrative <br /> solutions to these conflicts in the Upper Colorado <br /> River and Platte River Basins, <br /> 301 <br /> APPENDIX D ai/9c <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.