Laserfiche WebLink
utilities in the state with the objective of obtaining financing <br /> for the development of authorized CRSP projects or other projects <br /> which would result in an equivalent level of development. The <br /> means to achive this objective are negotiable. Motion adopted <br /> unanimously. <br /> Agenda Item 13 - Colorado River Enhanced Snowpack Test (CREST) <br /> Mr. McDonald recalled that at its January 14-15 , 1985 , meeting, <br /> the Board discussed funding proposals for CREST and adopted motions <br /> reiterating the state ' s previous position on CREST. Also, the <br /> Board provided comments for the Governor' s consideration as he <br /> prepared his response to the November 23 , 1984 , letter from the <br /> Commissioner of Reclamation regarding CREST. <br /> On January 31, 1985 , the staff met with representatives of the <br /> other basin states and the Bureau of Reclamation to discuss ways <br /> that would permit the CREST program to move ahead. At that meeting, <br /> Colorado restated its opposition to the use of CRSP power revenues <br /> for the funding of CREST. <br /> A proposal by California was discussed that would defer the <br /> states ' "share" of the cost of implementing CREST until an opera- <br /> tional program could be implemented. Then, a surcharge against <br /> only the increased generation resulting from augmentation would be <br /> assessed, which surcharge would be sufficient to repay the cost of <br /> the CREST program. In effect, the federal government would fund <br /> . the CREST demonstration program, and those costs would be recovered <br /> by surcharges on power generated through an operational program <br /> (assuming that the demonstration program was successful) . <br /> Although the proposal has, according to Mr, McDonald' s <br /> knowledge, not been formally presented to Reclamation, it is the <br /> understanding that such a plan is not acceptable to the Commis- <br /> sioner. No other new proposals for funding CREST were presented. <br /> Although no formal action was taken, the Board by consensus <br /> maintained its position with respect to CREST funding as expressed <br /> in motions adopted at the July 13 , 1984 , and January 14-15 , 1985 , <br /> meetings. <br /> Agenda Item 14 - President' s FY 1986 Budget (Appendix I attached) <br /> Mr. McDonald reported that the President' s FY 1986 budget request <br /> for the Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps of Engineers was for- <br /> warded to Congress in early February. Table 1, which is attached <br /> to Appendix I , is a summary of the funds requested for projects under <br /> or ready for construction in Colorado. This table also shows a <br /> comparison of FY 86 budget requests to funds appropriated in FY <br /> 1985. Funds requested for FY 1986 are about $28 million less than <br /> funds available in FY 85. <br /> 4 <br /> -9- <br />