Laserfiche WebLink
■ <br /> I <br /> Ithe State Engineer to consider new sources? That ARCA could ... in other words, <br /> if David and Hal Simpson could agree that a new appropriation might be a <br /> satisfactory way of accomplishing the objective in`99,that we somehow modify <br /> this resolution today to make it clear that that was within what they could be <br /> discussing down the road? <br /> ITrujillo Is there objection to that? I had ... at least to my understanding was, somebody <br /> ... one of the members of the Compacts, had objected to it,but if I was wrong, <br /> please proceed. Mr. Pope, is there an objection to adding that additional <br /> authority? <br /> I Pope: This is David Pope. I think we had left unresolved the question of how to deal <br /> with that, so it's a good point to be brought up. I don't particularly have a <br /> problem with broadening the language but I would certainly want to make clear if <br /> I we did that,that that's not a commitment that we would be able to reach <br /> agreement on, new sources ... that certainly would allow the flexibility to consider <br /> it if we were able to reach agreement. <br /> IEvans: Mr. Pop e,this is Peter Evans, and I would just add that if you're agreeable I think <br /> I that it would certainly be appropriate, assuming that again, it's subject to the <br /> agreement being placed in writing prior to the action. <br /> Trujillo: Well,why don't we do this to make sure that we all understand correctly ... why <br /> Idon't we adopt the amendment that's before the Administration now, adding the <br /> words"in advance, and in writing."And if that that passes,then, of course, <br /> I someone, one of you can quickly draft up the additional language that would then <br /> be inserted in this. Is that agreeable? <br /> I Pope: So, let me ask, Mr. Chairman,this is David Pope, we're voting then on the <br /> amendment? <br /> I Trujillo: We're doing nothing more than amend the resolution, not on the resolution itself, <br /> to insert your language"in advance and in writing" and get that behind us, so that <br /> we can then take the next piece. <br /> IPope: My understanding is, and Dave and Randy correct me,but I think Kansas can <br /> support the amendment. <br /> IBrenn: Yes. <br /> IHayzlett: Yes. <br /> Trujillo: Why don't we call for the vote on that, and to be clear, this is merely on amending <br /> G:\ARCA\1vt8ETINGS\1999\SP61499A revl.wpd <br /> 1 21 edited:December 13,2004;printed:December 13,2004 <br /> I <br />