My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes of Arkansas River Compact Administration Special Telephonic Meeting June 14 1999
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
Minutes of Arkansas River Compact Administration Special Telephonic Meeting June 14 1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/26/2014 8:36:10 AM
Creation date
11/26/2014 8:36:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
ARCA Minutes of a Special Meeting 06/14/1999 Telephonic
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Date
6/14/1999
Title
ARCA Minutes of a Special Meeting 06/14/1999 Telephonic
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7 <br /> I <br /> Ichange the `76 criteria. I think those criteria maybe need to be re-examined, but <br /> not today. <br /> IRolfs: Okay. <br /> Miller: I think the other thing is that, if the proposal to move water from the flood pool <br /> I into the permanent pool is not something that Kansas can approve, we could use <br /> today's meeting,maybe we'd want to take a look at the notice,but ARCA can <br /> I approve other sources of water for the permanent pool, and we do have all the <br /> ARCA members on, and we've had some discussion about other water that we <br /> might be able to approve today to put in the permanent pool if Kansas wanted to <br /> Ipursue that or hear us on that. <br /> Evans: Mr. Chairman,this is Peter Evans, I wonder if I could ask David Pope for a little <br /> Iclarification? <br /> Trujillo: Certainly, Mr. Evans. <br /> IEvans: David, it sounds like you'd be willing to consider other sources, is that true? <br /> IPope: Yes,I think in general terms I would be. Obviously I'd want to know what that is, <br /> but I think the `76 Resolution allows that and we're willing to do that, I think in <br /> I essence the resolution that's been drafted before us would allow some forms of <br /> transfers at least, if we adopted it, on provisions that the Colorado State Engineer <br /> and the Kansas Chief Engineer would have to agree. I'd have to ask my fellow <br /> compact members,but I think we're at least willing to listen to proposals. <br /> Evans: This is Peter Evans again. I just wanted to be clear then that it wasn't...that the <br /> ' issue you were raising as a concern had to do with transferring the water from the <br /> flood pool as a source. <br /> IPope: Yes, that's a concern. <br /> Evans: OK. Then if we have other sources,we could propose those and you'd be willing <br /> Ito consider that. <br /> Pope: I think that's correct. <br /> IWitte: This is Steve Witte. David, I'd also like to ask you a question, and that is in what <br /> specific respect is the proposal that I described in your view contrary to the <br /> Ipermanent pool operating criteria of 1976? <br /> Pope: It was my view that water in the flood pool of John Martin Reservoir would not be <br /> G:\ARCA\MEEITNGS\1999\SP61499A revl.wpd <br /> 10 edited:December 13,2004;printed:December 13,2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.