Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> Mr. J. William McDonald 2 <br /> made later in the year when the magnitude of the 1984 runoff would be <br /> known. They also suggested that further studies should be performed <br /> to fully analyze the impacts of having such extra storage space. <br /> At the December 7, 1983, meeting in Las Vegas, we accepted formal <br /> comments from the Basin States, other Federal agencies, water user <br /> entities, and private citizens on our proposed 1984 operating plan. <br /> The position of the States' representatives was that they fully sup- <br /> ported the plan in terms of large releases through March to provide <br /> extra storage space in 1984, but that it was inappropriate to make a <br /> decision at that time regarding a January 1, 1985, storage level since <br /> operating year 1984 ends on September 30, 1984. We indicated that <br /> further written comments would be accepted, and that we would inform <br /> the States and other interests of our final 1984 operating plan early <br /> in 1984. We also presented a proposal for studying various opera- <br /> tional alternatives for the Colorado River reservoirs in 1984, so that <br /> we would have the benefit of those studies in developing operating <br /> plans for 1985 and future years. <br /> The final 1984 operating plan is as follows: releases greater than <br /> minimum downstream requirements will be made through March in order to <br /> reach a level of system storage space by April 1 that would enable the <br /> reservoirs to handle a heavy volume of runoff without requiring <br /> spillway flows at Glen Canyon Dam and without requiring damaging flood <br /> releases from Hoover, Davis, and Parker Dams. Releases in the period <br /> April-July will be based on actual runoff conditions but will result <br /> in greater available space on August 1 than the minimum flood control <br /> requirement of 1.5 maf. Under the current full reservoir conditions, <br /> the "602(a) Storage" requirement is not the criterion governing the <br /> release of water in 1984. <br /> Under assumed upper quartile runoff, April-July Lake Powell inflow <br /> 130 percent of average, the 1984 operating plan would have maintained <br /> Hoover Dam releases at about 23,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) <br /> through March, with an April 1 system storage space of about 8.0 maf. <br /> Releases averaging about 22,000 cfs would have continued through the <br /> remainder of water year 1984, resulting in an end-of-year storage of <br /> 23.8 maf in Lake Mead. Lake Powell end-of-year storage would be <br /> 23.5 maf. System storage space would be about 4.4 maf on August 1 and <br /> about 5.8 maf on September 30. Maximum releases from Parker Dam would <br /> be 21,500 cfs, and no flooding would occur along the lower Colorado <br /> River. <br /> However, the January forecast for April-July inflow to Lake Powell was <br /> 13.0 maf, which is 174 percent of the normal 7.46 maf spring runoff. <br /> This is approximately an upper decile inflow. The high forecast required <br /> us to increase our releases from Hoover Dam to an average 31,000 cfs <br /> for January. Parker Dam releases were increased to about 30,000 cfs. <br />