Laserfiche WebLink
Motion: To approve the recommended revisions to the <br /> • <br /> appropriations as set forth in the attached Appendix F. <br /> Moved by Mr. Robbins . <br /> Seconded by Mr. Kroeger. <br /> Approved: Yes . <br /> 10e. Policy Concerning Injury to instream flow rights . <br /> Gene Jencsok briefly outlined the problem and the alternate <br /> approaches as described in memo to Board. Considerable Board <br /> discussion followed. <br /> Mr. Robbins did not believe that Board could enforce <br /> stipulation after subdivision has been in operation and developer <br /> has gotten out. <br /> The general consensus was that option a was not acceptable <br /> and option c would be difficult or impossible to enforce. <br /> Motion was made for the staff to suggest criteria and <br /> guidelines and procedures to implement option for future <br /> consideration by the Board. <br /> • Moved by: Mr. Jackson <br /> Seconded by: Mr. Getches <br /> Approved: unanimously <br /> 10c. Ratify proposed stipulation <br /> Mr. Jencsok briefly reviewed case #4-83CW116 in light of the <br /> previous discussion and recommended that the previously filed. <br /> statement of opposition be withdrawn. At first, Mr . Lochhead <br /> moved and Mr. Jackson seconded a motion to maintain the statement <br /> of opposition. However, upon discussion of the small magnitude <br /> of injury and the fact that in past cases the Board has taken <br /> similar action the original motion was withdrawn and a second <br /> motion to withdraw statement of opposition was made, with the <br /> condition that this would not set a precedent. <br /> Moved by: Mr. Lochhead <br /> Seconded by: Mr . Getches <br /> Approved: Unanimously <br /> Case #2-82CW216 <br /> • <br /> -7- <br />