My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board Meeting 09/08/1983
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
2001-3000
>
Board Meeting 09/08/1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2014 3:58:16 PM
Creation date
11/21/2014 3:58:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
9/8/1983
Description
Minutes, Agenda, Memorandums September 08,09, 1983
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
o Alternative B -- Include all eligible segments of the Los <br /> Pinos River and its tributaries of Lake Creek, Flint <br /> Creek, Rincon La Osa, Rincon La Vaca, Snowslide and <br /> Sierra Vandera in the National System. <br /> o Alternative C -- Include all eligible segments of the Los <br /> Pinos River and its eligible tributaries (named above ) , <br /> except Lake Creek, in the National System. This would <br /> allow the Pine River Irrigation District to develop its <br /> water right at Emerald Lake. <br /> The study team recommended Alternative B, which would result <br /> in designation of approximately 54 miles of streams and 17 , 300 <br /> acres of wilderness landscape in the river corridor. <br /> Impacts of Desi nation (from Study Report) <br /> Given that the river is already in a wilderness area and <br /> private land is not involved, and that the river is not suitable <br /> for white-water boating, the only impacts of designation would be <br /> the annual cost for operation, maintenance, and administration, <br /> which was estimated at $7 ,000, and the opportunity cost of water <br /> impoundment at Emerald Lake and mineral exploration in the river <br /> corridor being foregone. The river would apparently receive no <br /> greater protection than already afforded to it as a component of <br /> the Weminuche Wilderness Area. <br /> Current Legislation (S. 1084) <br /> S. 1084 would designate the same reaches and classifications <br /> as the study report recommended . <br /> /bm <br /> • <br /> -2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.