Laserfiche WebLink
July 23, 1951: Lamar, Colorado <br /> • Special Committee on Gunnison-Arkansas Project <br /> Attendance .,1 <br /> Fry-Ark Project Preliminary Report: <br /> Colorado comments: <br /> Plan of operation set forth by CWCB is satisfactory. .. .1 <br /> Project is economically and engineeringly feasible ,.2 <br /> Colorado is obligated to see that project does not <br /> interfere with any interstate compact 2 <br /> Need for imported water is great 2 <br /> Kansas' comments: <br /> ARCA not intended to interfere with development in Co2 <br /> Concern over mingling of native and imported waters2 <br /> Chairman's comments: <br /> Report's statement that project conforms with all <br /> Compact provisions unsupported in text 2-3 <br /> Report based on studies ending in 1944 - why not 1950?.3 <br /> Conflicting statements on evaporation losses. . .. . .... ..3 <br /> Reregulation of water at Pueblo needs more detail 3 <br /> Chairman's recommendations: <br /> ARCA approves and supports the Fry-Ark project 3 <br /> ARCA should scrutinize all project operating plans, <br /> regulations and agreements affecting native waters3 <br /> Kansas' comments: text 4 <br /> Statement to be revised 4-5 <br /> Committee's recommendation: text 5-6 <br /> I <br /> July 24, 1951: Lamar, Colorado <br /> Attendance. . <br /> Approval of minutes 2 <br /> Secretary's report 2-3 <br /> Chairman's report: <br /> Fry-Ark project report: correspondence with the <br /> Secretary of the Interior 3-5 <br /> JMR permanent pool: corresp, with the Las Animas <br /> Sportsman Association 5-7 <br /> JMR operations: Corps to establish study panel .7 <br /> Treasurer's report 8-12 <br /> Frontier Ditch gage installation 12 <br /> Operations committee report: JMR storage report.. 13 <br /> Fry-Ark project plan: report of special committee 14-17 <br /> Kansas' concern with regulation of native waters.. ... . . .15 <br /> Resolution: send comments to both governors 15-17 <br /> 5 <br /> i <br />