My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Transcripts of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 12/13,14/1948
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
Transcripts of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 12/13,14/1948
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2014 4:08:45 PM
Creation date
11/18/2014 1:17:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Seventeenth Meeting of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 12/13,14/1948 Denver, Co.
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Author
Commissioners
Title
Seventeenth Meeting of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 12/13,14/1948 Denver, Co.
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
212
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
m <br /> v <br /> 44 0 <br /> 0 <br /> m <br /> 0 <br /> MR. MENDENHALL: I think the interpretation of that <br /> wouldn' t Just be running 100 feet down the river and not be <br /> diverting it to beneficial use because it were available. <br /> O <br /> MR. IRELAND: The water could go across the Stateline. <br /> Kansas didn' t order it and can't use it past Garden City. <br /> That is a waste of water, but that is unavoidable. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: That is quite a different case, Gail. <br /> This ts water that only Colorado can call for. <br /> MR. IRELAND: I see. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: It has nothing to do with water going <br /> by Garden City. It is water that only Colorado can demand. <br /> MR. TATE: I think "avoidable" does not mean anything. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAM R: What is your interpretation of that <br /> term, Mr. Knapp, as a practical matter? <br /> MR. <br /> KNAPP: Well, I am not sure that I know what it <br /> means, in view of the discussion just had, but What was in my <br /> mind as we put that in was that Colorado would not seek the <br /> passage of that 100 cubic feet through their reservoir during <br /> the winter months unless they were prepared to use it. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: Well, that is substantially, I think, <br /> what Mr. Mendenhall said. That leads me to this question, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.