Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> 38 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> m <br /> 0 <br /> by which we could ask for more water than gets across the <br /> Stateline by virtue of storage. <br /> MR. IRELAND: That is right. 0 <br /> MR. LAPP. When this same section was dieoussed at a 0 <br /> prior meeting, I believe both Mr. Mendenhall and I made the <br /> statements In the regard pointing out that there will be with <br /> the operation of John Martin Reservoir periods when flood <br /> spills might take place, in which water would be available <br /> for future storage upstream. I am inclined to agree with Mr. <br /> Tate that this would apt as much as a bar to that development <br /> upstream on John Martin, or would be more likely to than <br /> anything else. <br /> MR. YRm D: It would work both ways. <br /> MR. TATE: I think it would be more apparent upstream <br /> than it would be below. <br /> MR. VIDAL: Well, I submitted my suggestion without <br /> comment, and it can be passed over. <br /> MR. IRELAND: It is all right with me. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER* I take it, then, that Colorado does <br /> not press this point, and is agreeable to making no further <br /> change in paragraph D. <br />