Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> 32 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> G <br /> C7 <br /> m <br /> 0 <br /> but it plaoes a limitation on both states as it now exists. <br /> m <br /> ChAIRMAN KRAMER: Any other diaoussion? <br /> --i <br /> O <br /> MR. IRELAND. Well, I think it goes to this point, as I <br /> understand it, if I can express it properly here: We are <br /> talking about--aren' t we at this time saying that any future m <br /> development in that basin must not materially deplete the <br /> usable quantity or availability for-use so far as present <br /> storage and diversion facilities are oonoerned? <br /> MR. TATE: No. <br /> MR. IRELAND; Well, then, would that mean,--let' s assume <br /> that Kansas might 'develop another 80,000 acres of land for <br /> irrigation and in 87 it is limited or restricted to existing <br /> conditions, Kansas would be in a position, would she not, to <br /> say that so long as she could continue to develop new uses, <br /> they would come first? <br /> MR. TATE: What? <br /> MR. IRELAND: That these new uses of Kansas would come <br /> - first. <br /> MR. TATE: Well, no, how could they? We can' t have any <br /> more water, Gail. We can't have it. It isn't physically <br /> possible. If we did have, it would have to originate below <br /> the dam. <br />