Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> rj a� <br /> G( O <br /> 0 <br /> n <br /> m <br /> o' <br /> MR. IRELAND: Well, that is my understanding. I was won- H> <br /> H <br /> daring if we have said it clearly. m, <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: We said it here. We arbitrarily define Z <br /> 'river flow' as being the sum of two measurements, and we <br /> know physically that there is other water entering John Martin <br /> Reservoir that is unmeasurable, and we disregarded it, setting <br /> as arbitrary defin ition. Xs that olearly understood? Is that . <br /> clear to you now, Gail? <br /> MR. IRELAND: I believe it Is. I agree with that. This <br /> indefinite understanding which I had is cleared up. The term <br /> 'river flow' does not include—all river flow can be divided. <br /> It includes any water called for under decrees. <br /> MR. VIDAL: Well, we say that. <br /> MR. IRELAND: That is what I say. That is my under- <br /> standing. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: However, the river flow is substantially <br /> all water that is coming in, with the exception of any measur- <br /> able part, but for the purpose of definiteness, it is only <br /> the sum of those two measurements. <br /> Anything else in Article III? <br /> MR. VIDAL: Well, now, I am obliged to call attention <br /> to the suggestion made by Mr. Tipton for a definition of <br />