Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> m <br /> 25 o <br /> 0 <br /> m <br /> 0 <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: They have answered that. _' <br /> MR. IRELAND: I am Just confused on it. I am trying to <br /> 0 <br /> clear up my own mind on it. <br /> CHAIRMAN DER: I think you are, because I don't think <br /> you have taken cognizance of this physioality: The term <br /> 'river flow• is intended to be arithmetically the sum of two <br /> quantities, the quantity of water flowing past the Purgatoire <br /> gage and the quantity of water measured at the Arkansas <br /> River gage. Now, those two gages don't know the consistency <br /> or the origin or the composition of the water flow by them, <br /> they just measure the water. <br /> MR. KNAPP: Or how that water is to be allotted, whether <br /> to flow through to satisfy priorities or whether it is to be <br /> stored and later allotted. <br /> MR.' IRELAND: Well, it goes back, to my thinking, to <br /> paragraph 8, page 6. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: Refer to the Article, please, Gail. <br /> MR. IRELAND: Article V-B, page 6, in which you use the <br /> expression "river flow" in connection with Colorado getting <br /> the first 600 feet and Kansas the next 260. Now, I Just want <br /> to be sure we have said what we mean and make the general <br /> term of "river flow, " and do not exolude such waters as might <br />