Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br /> 0 <br /> 37 " <br /> m <br /> 0 <br /> -r <br /> • words "flood control and" be stricken. That paragraph states m <br /> the purposes of the Compact, to divide certain benefits be- <br /> 0 <br /> tween the states, but of course this Compact is not dividing <br /> flood control benefits. And therefore the words "flood control 0 <br /> and" are not germane no this Compact. N <br /> I would be glad to have comments on those changes, either <br /> on or off the record. <br /> SECRETARX NCB.: There will be benefits arising from the <br /> operation of the reservoir for flood control purposes in so <br /> far as those flood waters are realized. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: lies, they become conservation benefits, <br /> and it is those benefits that are being allocated. But there <br /> is no allocation on the subject of flood prevention. It is a <br /> fine point, but I think it is an appropriate one. <br /> MR. IRELAND: Don't you thins B and C really cover two <br /> separate things there? B provides for beneficial use of the <br /> reservoir, whereas C is "equitably divide and apportion be- <br /> tween" the two states waters and their utilization. . It seems <br /> to me they are two entirely different subjects. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: Perhaps I should relate my comment to <br /> flood control. Paragraph B provides for the beneficial util- <br /> ization of John Martin Reservoir. But this Compact does not <br />