Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> O <br /> O <br /> 34 <br /> o. <br /> the board, Mr. McMurtry, and I don' t remember who else, <br /> because of difficulties in operation of the Santa Ye <br /> railroad and the highway bridge Just above on Cheyenne <br /> DI <br /> 0 <br /> Creek, which diffioulties were recently manifested to an <br /> extent the Santa Fe could not run trains over it for a <br /> while. They had already taken measures to clear that channel m <br /> of Cheyenne Creek, and I as told by Mr. Wilson, the pr-es - j <br /> deft of the company, that they intend to .enlarge that <br /> channel so that the Frontier Ditch can take its water out <br /> of Cheyenne Creek. <br /> That does not involve the drainage out of Cheyenne <br /> Creek into the river. Originally the Frontier Ditoh had <br /> a ditch from the river. That was never recognised, of <br /> course. That is the present plan for our operation. <br /> However, the water is Colorado water, and is taken Out <br /> in Kansas. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: The resulting question is whether <br /> that water is part of Kansas' share under this Compact. <br /> MR. TIDAL: Let me talk off the record. <br /> (Discussion off the record. ) <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: Let me reopen the record with this <br /> observation, that at our last meeting the question with <br /> regard to Article VI-B was whether it was satistaotory to <br /> Kansas. Colorado I think unequivooally stated its accept- <br />