Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br /> 0 <br /> 29 <br /> O <br /> Judgment of the Kansas commissioners that we will as usual <br /> yield to Colorado, with the idea of going along generally <br /> with the suggestion to meet a statement dictated into the <br /> 0 <br /> record by Mr. Vidal. However, as I say, that is going <br /> along generally with the idea. We would like to have some <br /> oopies made of that statement so that we could read it over. <br /> I think it is very short. We may dot an ' 1.' or cross a 't', <br /> but I think we can come to some agreement if we do that. <br /> MR. KMAPP: Referring to Kr. Vidal's draft of <br /> Article V-K or his statement regarding it. <br /> MR. ARM: He made a statement regarding it, I believe, <br /> or if I am wrong on this he dictated the substance of it <br /> into the record. <br /> KR. NOE It is that V-R that he dictated into the <br /> record that is wanted; is that not right? <br /> MR. ARM: Yes, with the amendment providing for no- <br /> tice to the Administration. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: As I understand the alternative <br /> language that Mr. Vidal dictated into the record did not <br /> contain a proviso explicitly for giving notice to the <br /> Administration. However, I will ask the reporter to run <br /> off during the noon hour, if he will, nine copies of <br /> Article V-K as dictated earlier in these proceedings by <br />