Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> v <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> c <br /> 28 m <br /> 0 <br /> offered here in the way of a proviso as a possible middle <br /> ground. <br /> MR. ARK: It occurs to me, General, that this could be 0 <br /> done: Offhand, I think that Kansas could submit to the <br /> 0 <br /> jurisdiction for some particular matter to the courts of < <br /> other states, could voluntarily do that, and would be bound <br /> by it. But to get down to the question of whether they <br /> would want to do that—of course, any state is reluctant <br /> to submit the rights of its oitisens to the Jurisdiction <br /> of the courts of another state, whether of Colorado, <br /> Kansas, or any other state. <br /> MR. VIDAL: Let me say this, we start with the premise <br /> that no transfer can be had without action by the Colorado <br /> court. Suppose, for instance, that Keese sold its water <br /> rights to Marry Mendenhall's district. That could not <br /> be accomplished without a decree of the Colorado courts <br /> under proper notice. That is an essential proceeding. <br /> We start with that ; we oannot do otherwise. <br /> The most extreme illustration we oould give is to say <br /> that suppose all the water users of Colorado Water <br /> District 87 abandoned their irrigation, sold their water <br /> rights to the upper ditches, we thereby provide that in <br /> any proceeding (which has to be had under Colorado law) <br /> notice shall be given to this Compact Administration. Now <br />