Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> v <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> c <br /> 0 <br /> 17 <br /> Federal agencies or other agencies which they send to <br /> the state, where the Administration is supposed to give <br /> advice on those things--ism&t that correct? <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: If I may comment on that point, I 0 <br /> think you are referring to Article VIII-G, which deals m <br /> purely with the procedure as affecting Federal projects <br /> and the review of Federal projects. The oom*ission has <br /> not discussed that in any great detail as yet, and I <br /> think it is quite doubtful whether the commission will <br /> retain that provision in the final writing of the Com- <br /> pact. In any event, it does not go, as it is now written <br /> at least, to any state or private enterprises or proposals <br /> for construction. It deals purely with the machinery con- <br /> sistent with the Aot of Congress concerning Federal <br /> projects. <br /> o I do not believe, Mr. Vidal, that such matter as <br /> we are now discussing in V.4 fits into VIII-4, as it is <br /> now written. <br /> MR. VIDAL: All right; I have no objection. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: Welcome, Mr. Ireland, how are you, <br /> sir! <br /> MR. VIDAL: I have no objection—Mr. Tate, if you <br /> will listen to this--to making a provision that any pro- <br />