My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Transcripts of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 09/13,14,15,16,17/1948
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
Transcripts of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 09/13,14,15,16,17/1948
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2014 4:08:29 PM
Creation date
11/18/2014 1:16:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Fifteenth Meeting of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 09/13,14,15,16,17/1948 Colorado Springs, Co.
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Author
Commissioners
Title
Fifteenth Meeting of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 09/13,14,15,16,17/1948 Colorado Springs, Co.
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
m <br /> v <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> 14 m <br /> O <br /> the 4apletion of the 4addoa water supply, as Kansas i..s, <br /> and we had adopted that Article IT accordingly to meet m <br /> the situation relating to developments upstream, changes H <br /> 0 <br /> of oonstruotion, and so forth. <br /> I would say that under the broad provision of our <br /> statute any party claiming an injury by a proposed trans- m <br /> for has a right to come into the court adjudicating t s <br /> right proposed tO be transferred. I will go farther <br /> and say that perhaps the Administration rhioh we provide <br /> for in this Compact would have the same right. <br /> I *all attention also to the provisions in the <br /> Adminl.stration Article which provides that findings of <br /> the Administration shall not be conclusive. This pro- <br /> posed finding in the instance of a transfer, by this <br /> Article would be made conclusive and be contradictive <br /> of another provision. I would may further that, as was <br /> held in the LAPlata oast', provision. of the Compact would <br /> be controlling en the courts with respect to that question. <br /> I have ooamented also to the effect that .I did not <br /> consider tt a very practical situation; the possibilities <br /> are extremely remote, but I have been under considerable <br /> pressure from Colorado interests to put various provisions <br /> in this Compact, and one of the provisions is objection <br /> to any relinquishment of control or disposition of our <br /> water except as affected by the Compact. Therefore, I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.