Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> v <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> 11 0 <br /> discussed with the representatives of the Bureau of Reele- <br /> mation, and that the Chairman had discussed with the office <br /> of the Chief of Engineers at Washington as to future oen- <br /> z <br /> struotion, development and so forth, of work above the <br /> river. <br /> Kr. Tate, without having seen my draft (as I say, our <br /> letters crossed), submitted a proposed paragraph I of <br /> Article V, which the reporter need not copy, but I shall <br /> be glad to read. (Reads. ) <br /> You will note very readily that the fundamental dif- <br /> ferenoe between the two drafts is Mr. Tate' s suggestion <br /> that the thing shall not be done until the entry and final <br /> determination by the Admin$etration, which I omit in my <br /> draft. <br /> l then wrote Mr. Tate (I do not know that I "sent this <br /> letter to anyone else except the Colorado commissioner) <br /> another letter, dated August 10, 1948. <br /> The Colorado court would have jurisdiction, meaning <br /> the District Court of Bent county, because that is where <br /> all the priorities in District 6? were adjudicated. For <br /> that matter, the same thing is true about District 17, which <br /> happened to be adjudicated in that District because of <br /> our statute conferring Jurisdiction in the first session <br /> in Deoember of a certain year, and continuing thereafter. <br /> Now, that states in a few words the difference be- <br />