Laserfiche WebLink
26 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> m <br /> 0 <br /> ›. <br /> I . IMLAliat Coming to Proviso (2) , 7ou aro runiling <br /> m. <br /> into the very thing Henry and I were tallcing about. Shall <br /> we go into noro detail a to Colorado dltohea tihinh divert 0 <br /> water, ar use thin 1pm.guage„ °upstream ditohen"? <br /> 0 <br /> CHAIRHAN KAANI : You are bac& to the same we had in <br /> - <br /> Proviso A. Before we get to that, let's /oak oritiealIy <br /> at the first proviso, whidh readO, "Colorado may eall for <br /> the passage through the Reeervoir or re/ease of river flaw <br /> not to mooed 500 o.f.s.s.-. <br /> 11R. IlatiVarliALL: °Of," that nhould be "of.° °Colorado <br /> may <br /> Gall for the passage throa#1 the Fteserroirn...- <br /> KAA, TATE: The words dor release° don't go in there. <br /> GAia."-VV-4; :,0• <br /> 11R. LiEtklin g The thing ,i4hioh goon, is It the p4,:seage <br /> through the reservoir? <br /> CHAIRila MAUER: Yes, "mat dal/ for the paseage <br /> through the renorvoir of river flows— <br /> MA, ARN; strike out or releaseifi <br /> (DisoUgaion off the reoord,) <br /> CJAIRHa KRAI : I queetiou the advieability of wring <br /> the wording 4paseage through the reservoir." I thla I oom, <br /> mented on test moo before, and I thia it introduoon an <br /> awkward wording. It in A nonoept that in Lot entirely eor. <br /> root, bowline the water the eonee out of the renervoir in <br /> not the idootifAal water that oomen in, We don't aotwaly <br />