Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> n <br /> m <br /> 0 <br /> A <br /> H <br /> I would ?refer not to R oaept a wholesale set of <br /> revioions, an I feel it would be confusing. I shall be <br /> guided, however, by the winheo of the Commission th the <br /> etinduot of this business. My first question was, of course, <br /> 0 <br /> and I think we have gotten away from it a little bit, should <br /> we place the draft or rather the revised draft which the <br /> Secretary has prepared in accordance with the Commission's <br /> instructions—should that draft be now placed upon the record <br /> as a basis for further consideration? <br /> MR. I:NAPP: Mr, Chairman, I am :~oink to ':love that the <br /> draft of February 6, l948, vrspared by the Secretary, be <br /> placed on the record, subject to amendment and bate. <br /> '(ill you clad to tIlf,t "consirt1r,ry of <br /> seventeen °?agn rl, " no we will :snow for cure? That S c ;:hat <br /> �i/ i t'1 4Cri.U <br /> mine is, at least. <br /> R. KLAPP: It in the revised draft consisting of <br /> eventeex, ?t or aad nine artiol€n. <br /> CITAI .? AT .RtA:I r: Is there ,ecos-,c to that notion? <br /> c'c. VIDAL: Well , I will ►:acorid - otiorn, flubleet <br /> to the understanding that it is merely for the purpose of <br /> identification and dinoussion, and with the express nntention <br /> on my part, at least, to submit 'ghat tlto ChairriL.n ., (Lc nip- <br /> hated ac----what life' you nay—blanket? <br /> CH,Ir,HHAl Ail is Alternative. <br /> th. V rDAL: Wholccalt? "�. ni " �' •�`i r !!.t ;f fne <br /> l 1 �t <br />