Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 1 <br /> 15 <br /> Y <br /> -A <br /> at leant as far as Colorado is concerned, has been something -A <br /> outside of general administration expense of the Colorado <br /> Water Board, and our Compacts have fairly well agreed on <br /> the division of the expense of administration. Would that <br /> be an element in the situation? <br /> C£tA RMAII KRAMER s Well, it is my underetaunding that (,' <br /> ueing the Republican Compact as a model, the gaging that the <br /> U.8..4.8.. would do for an interstate eo spaot wouldn a t be on a <br /> cooperative fund basis, and therefore the method Of financing <br /> whereby the Colorado Water Board contributes to the U.C.G.8. <br /> for regular gaging wouldn't be applicable. If the language <br /> of the Compact is properly drawn, it will enable the U..$.(r.8. <br /> to include in its annual budget for Federal appropriation <br /> an item covering operation and maintenance of gages for this <br /> Compact solely at Federal expense. It is to the perfection <br /> of such language that our discussion with Mr.. Paulson should <br /> point. <br /> Dods that answer your question? <br /> MR. VIDAL: Yes. <br /> CHAIrRM U K IER: Now, with respect to fir. Dixon, it <br /> in the sense of the Commission that it will welcome his par.. <br /> tioipation in our current meeting. However, it is deemed <br /> desirable for the Comiaiasion to consider in its own course <br /> of business come of the matters that Mr. Dixon, as a rep— <br /> recentative of the Department of the Interior& will be inter.- <br />