Laserfiche WebLink
31 <br /> o <br /> 0 <br /> -{ <br /> MR. VIDAL: So I thing the way the situation stands <br /> now-- <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: I take it then that-- <br />' D <br /> MR. VIDAL: --you are inserting right here this lan- <br /> guage as an explanation of this report that you have made in <br /> stating that you expect to use that same thought in connec- <br /> Lion with further .reports. <br /> CHAIRMAN KRAMER: That is the essence of this submit- <br /> tal at this time, correct. I take it, then, that informally <br /> the Committee on Legal Affairs sees no objection or impro- <br /> priety in the use of the definition and the language proposed <br /> by the Engineering Committee for the purpose of the Engineering <br /> Committeel:s reports.,, I think that the first objective was to <br /> get that blessing, you might say, and I take it we have re- <br /> ceived that blessing. <br /> It does not close this subject in so far as defini= <br /> tions in compact terms are concerned, but we are not now <br /> discussing compact language and therefore it will come up <br /> again when that subject is before us. <br /> I would like to call attention to one other point in <br /> the report of the Engineering Committee,.., We say the Committee <br /> is giving serious consideration to the development of a work:: <br /> able basis for apportioning Arkansas River water, which may <br /> preclude--that is, the basis of an apportionment--may pre_ <br /> olude the necessity for making reservoir operating studies <br />