Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> 22 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> D <br /> H <br /> means. That is what I feel. <br /> MR. ARN : I feel the same way. <br /> 0 <br /> CHAIRMAN KttAM R: Well, if the Commission is satis- <br /> r <br /> , fied with it as it stands, there is no need for further <br /> study or debate. If the Commission wants to refer it to m <br /> the Committee on Legal Affairs, that is up to the Commission <br /> to do. The Engineering Committee has concocted this language, <br /> It is now before you and is subject to your pleasure. <br /> MR. VI DAL: Well, I am going to say just a few words <br /> and then finish my part of the discussion as to this. <br /> This Is a proposed statement from your Committee, up- <br /> on which you base certain factual recommendations. Whether <br /> they will be adopted, whether they will be satisfactory, is <br /> a matter for us to consider. Until we see. their application <br /> and the effect of the distinction, if any, between the pos- <br /> sible meaning of those words and their consistency with other <br /> authorities you get confused when you talk about water. <br /> Flow is one thing. Now, in talking about water, <br /> your definition is fairly clear. I think your word native <br /> is fairly general, but suppose you get down seven or eight <br /> thousand feet and pump up water we never got down to before. <br /> As far as I am concerned, when I see how it applies to the <br /> situation that we are going to deal with and how it affects <br /> your recommendations and how it affects the operation of <br /> your proposed allocation, I would be more prepared to skive <br />