Laserfiche WebLink
35 <br /> m <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> c <br /> C) <br /> m <br /> a <br /> up again, there is a very serious question about being - <br /> able to identify it at all, and if you can identity it to <br /> H <br /> keep control of it physically so that it does not become 0 <br /> a part of a water supply that le legally subject to diver. <br /> 0 <br /> sion and use under existing appropriations. <br /> There are discussions about the boundaries of dis- U) <br /> triots. And as long as the water can be definitely identi- <br /> fled and is within that district, I think the ooncensus <br /> here if that' some effort will be made to try to determine <br /> the amount. How that will be done I are not sure. It le go.. <br /> ing to mean a lot of detail work and a lot of complications <br /> in the administrative system of this state, leaving out en- <br /> tirely the question of any interstate complications. <br /> M114 VIDAL: There was a decision in our court last <br /> month about the Collier Ditch and the returns from Bessemer <br /> East of Pueblo, and an original opinion rendered and the <br /> modification of that opinion. I read it only in an unofti- <br /> ©lal publioation, Gail, but if you would like to go to the <br /> Supreme Court and get the original opinion--it is not pub.. <br /> liehed yet. <br /> . IX LAUD: That didn't deal with imported water. <br /> KR. Aatis What is that case, Henry? <br /> MR. VIDAL: They will tell you at the Clerk's office, <br /> The Collier Ditch and the Bessemer Ditch, east of Pueblo. <br /> Somebody put a da!a across the arroy down there. Charley, <br />