Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> 23 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> Boars tru t we do it. <br /> -A <br /> I vented to state that for the record at this time in <br /> the dieouesion. <br /> -A <br /> I feel there are other tatters that Iebler has brouglat Z <br /> up. I don't know whether this is the plane to discuss them. <br /> For instance, Kansas furnishing water for some wildlife pur- <br /> m <br /> poses, and he suggests the same thing for Colorado, that we <br /> • <br /> ought to allocate waiter to the Federal. Government for fish <br /> and wildlife purposes. He says that we should do that in this <br /> • <br /> Compact. There again before the State of Colorado agrees <br /> through these Compact Commireioners for any such thing, that <br /> is a utter that will have to be taken up by our State Water <br /> Board because they are in charge of that sort of proposal in <br /> our Mate. <br /> C hAIhR.A* K.RlottRI It is true, Mr. Patterson, that Kr. <br /> Debl+er' s remarks vent to that point, but in his summary, no <br /> specific mention was made that a desire for allocation further <br /> than for recreational purposes, and aocordingly it is my <br /> thought that that subject is not one which the Department of <br /> the interior is pressing or reequecttng of this Compaot Commis- <br /> sion. <br /> . PATTER3OI i I agree with you, Mr. Chairman. He made, <br /> on page b?, as a purely personal observation as to the sugges- <br /> tion that a Compact should allot water to the Federal Govern- <br /> . <br /> • <br /> ment for fish and wildlife purposes parallel to the allotments <br />• <br />