Laserfiche WebLink
m <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> m <br /> 0 <br /> irrigation we would release all except 10,000 acre feet. <br /> In other words we didn' t <br /> ► � change any portion an �. �r o. 1 except <br /> the assumption of that firth pool, and that way we tried to <br /> get a comparable result. <br /> the picture that developed from that first study is <br /> one of slowing the amounts of additional spill that will exist <br /> by raises of separating that 10,000 &ere toot in there. welly <br /> time we get a run of water it simply onuses water to aolate <br /> in the flood pool sooner; otherwise it we had it empty we would <br /> have conserved it. It also has the result of increasing the <br /> amount of water lost by evaporation during periods of an empty <br /> reservoir. In Study No 1 we made no correction for evaporation <br /> or transpiration, but a.3&uaeci that it would cause the salut <br /> amount of water to run, the river water through the reservoir <br /> site, as it had in nature before the reservoir was built. But <br /> with the pool in there, them it would have this etlset of ex- <br /> posing the surface waters and the adjoining silted areas would <br /> cause a good deal of loss of water that was not there in nature. <br /> We also found in this first study that that less of <br /> water in part would deprive downstream users of their ability <br /> to get additional supplies out of Caddo& Reservoir, but more <br /> importantly and more largely it would fall upon the appoeprla.. <br /> %ions of water users above Caddoa Reservoir as a natural out. <br /> growth of the system of administration that :prevailed In <br /> uolorada under which ii t;hes above Orkddow, arc required to <br />