Laserfiche WebLink
1® <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> C-) <br /> m <br /> 0 <br /> distribution of the new water to be made available se be,. <br /> tween the two states, the 4.2,000, which we find is an indt ems. <br /> tion of the increase in Kansas was somewhat greater than the, 0 <br /> 27,000 in Colorado, and an effort is under way to adjust on <br /> 0 <br /> some basis that will bring these substantially into a parity. <br /> And those are matters that subsequent studies are oontesp1ated <br />,::.. to covers but which I think personally--an I think George <br /> agrees with as.-ire should not undertake in any final or cane <br /> plete form until after the whole question of how much of this <br /> spats we can use is settled with the Liar Department. We are <br /> making too many assumptions about the problem that we can <br /> probably get an adjustment on. Therefore we can make a study <br /> on whatever agreement this Commission oomes to. <br /> ii. I R LAN D$ Wnat was that last possible adjustment? <br /> MA. PATT16' i s The first one was siltation; the <br /> s eeeend more water for 89, and the third to try to bring time* <br /> two values of new water, the Colorado quota of 27,000 up <br /> seven or eight thousand, and lower the 42,000 to Kansas, until <br /> they are equal. <br /> MA. Xr4APMs That is, lower the 42,000 of computed <br /> usable state line flow? <br /> Mi4, PATTI 30NS Additional now state line flow, <br /> uR. KNAPP: Down to the quantity at the state line <br /> somewhere, somewhat the equivalent of the increased diver. <br />