My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Transcripts of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions10/23,24/1946
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
Transcripts of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions10/23,24/1946
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/18/2014 1:50:33 PM
Creation date
11/17/2014 3:46:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Fifth Meeting of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 10/23,24/1946 Topeka,Kansas
State
KS
Author
Commissioners
Title
Fifth Meeting of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 10/23,24/1946 Topeka,Kansas
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
15 <br /> O <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> this summary that is here before me has been arranged., they �! <br /> gam out a process of study in which the total water sup- Z <br /> plies are added up and the total deaands are added up, and 0 <br /> the relations, the operation results are worked out that way. <br /> 0 <br /> The next item shown on this sheet is accretions Beier <br /> Caddo*, which happens, however, to be a segregated item. It <br /> is not the total. It is what we have estimated are the usable <br /> portions of all accretions below Caddo*, 97,500. Tho unusable <br /> portion, downstream accretions average 22,800, so that we had <br /> before Caddo* came on the river a total water supply at and <br /> below Qaddaa averaging 439,900 acre feet annually. <br /> Bow, in all of these studies it is neo eary to account <br /> for all eater, and in Study No. 1 we found that the estimated <br /> additional diversions upstream would be 29,500 acre feet per <br /> tear, and we assumed that those diversions would double the <br /> new at Caddo* by the full amount of their diversions, s• that <br /> the now entering the reservoir in Study No. 1 was an average <br /> of 290,000 acre feet annually. <br /> I might remind you here at that point that the assump• <br /> too that all water diverted above Cad©oa will result in de- <br /> pletion of 100 per cent at Caddo" is not entirely accurate, <br /> but it was made in this tnetanoe in order to reflect the possi- <br /> bilities it those diversions can be made by some ditches it <br /> probably would represent full depletion, and other* net. o <br /> ti;at we have in :study < o. 1 some 410,900 oonsi.ting of 29,000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.