Laserfiche WebLink
7 <br /> 218 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> ` m <br /> said to us. By "us" I mean the Arkansas River users in m <br /> Colorado, the potential, tremendous industrial effeet of <br /> 0 <br /> the production of power incident to this project. <br /> MR, PATTi N: That is not elaborated on. <br /> MR. VIDAL: We are going to have a million or two <br /> people. Kelly 10 going to be a town of 50000 inhabitants, � <br /> and so forth. I am lust illustrating what we can get into <br /> it we go into the realms of conjecture. I realise we can* <br /> not bring water here without having some effect on the water <br /> that we have, but does that mean we can compact with respect <br /> to it? <br /> MR. PATTE ON s Henry,, let me give you another <br /> thought: If the group from Colorado should take the position <br /> that we are not going to pay any attention to these potential <br /> projects, and if we should **vise a compact which, in the <br /> opinion of thtilao Tart ma ag moies, precluded them from doing <br /> what they conceived to be their duty to the people of that <br /> Valley under the law, you can just bet your shirt on It that <br /> your *gmpaot is not going to be ratified by our legislature; <br /> nor approved by the Congress. That is sure and we had just <br /> as well face it. There are people in that Valley who think <br /> this is going to be built right away and are putting up <br /> their good money to promote it. If you will be objective, <br /> that that Bureau can go so far and say these fellows wont <br /> go ahead after we w r"L t.1.14** t;::d wits into 4 oc,zpact, tom° <br />