My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Transcripts of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 08/28,29/1946
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
Transcripts of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 08/28,29/1946
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2014 4:07:29 PM
Creation date
11/17/2014 3:45:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Fourth Meeting of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 08/28,29/1946
Basin
Arkansas
Author
Commissioners
Title
Fourth Meeting of the Arkansas River Compact Commissions 08/28,29/1946
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
209 <br /> �ti <br /> O <br /> 0 <br /> in the role of Federal representative. <br /> mi <br /> Without going into the baokground with which we <br /> are all familiar, the fact remains that Oadd a Dam or John ° <br /> Martin has a <br /> peculiar status, and that the total, cost of this <br /> oenstraetton has been borne by the United dtatea Government* <br /> and that cost is not payable directly by the mater users. .1 <br /> St and one other pro jeot are in that exempted category, <br /> counsel says. <br /> That gives Caddo* Reservoir a peculiar status in <br /> the Federal statute in that it represents an entirely Federal <br /> Investment and acmounts for the fact that Federal ageacj.es <br /> that you referred to had expressed an unusual interest. <br /> I think that fast must be recognised, as to the <br /> merits or equity, but as to the fact of the matter-. <br /> MR. KITCHFd•L; General, I don't think we are over <br /> looking that a bit. Our preposition is thief True, it t <br /> constructed with Federal funds and it has a public interest ,, <br /> but that public interest does not need to be so comprehensive <br /> that it destroys primary interests. That is our thought.' Of <br /> course, for me personally, I would prefer that the two states <br /> would issue bonds and pay the Federal Government bank and take <br /> it over, and let us be practical in that t regard.= It is just <br /> as such a public project with a limited objective as it could <br /> be with all possible objectives,. state of whioh we think in <br /> this instance conflict with the priaarar objestives'`' I think <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.