Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> 196 <br /> O <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> do not mean to say we should not say anything in the sonpaet <br /> about its but I do think, for our information and guidaide <br /> of our own Judgments we ought to have some factual iaforma. <br /> Lion as to the interests which the lower states have now or <br /> may have in the future in the waters of the future vhish we <br /> are arcing to divide between those two states. J <br /> Ian. vIDAL1 charley. t nil answer your questio <br /> very quiskly. 1 have no obJedtton whatever and will be gin, <br /> to learn, for ay information as a member of this Commissions <br /> any fasts. But speaking from the point of a lawyers advising <br /> ayeslf and advising you, I take the position that X took; 1 <br /> hays no objection to any investigation or any information fur. <br /> dished. What I do object to is opening the door by statenent <br /> in the mot of a reoogni,tion of that situation, unless we <br /> are simply obliged to. <br /> (Dissuasion off the record. ) <br /> (assess 11:46 a, a. to 12:16 p. a. ) <br /> =AMAX WNW:NW: Leta s see if vs cannot dispose of <br /> the point last under discussion and arrive at a suitable stop- <br /> ping place for recess. <br /> (Discussion off the reoord. ) <br /> CHAD ICA l9 is The questions we were disoussing <br /> .is the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs with respect to <br /> Oklahoma and Arkansas. We had some very illuminating ott.the-. <br />