Laserfiche WebLink
188 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 <br /> m <br /> 0 <br /> n: <br /> - i <br /> to a proposed diversion from the Colorado River Basin into <br /> the Arkansas River Basin is a matter concerning which this <br /> Commission would have no jurisdiction legally. 0 <br /> The statements of interest of the various other <br /> agencies contained in that communication your Cowittes felt <br /> did not need say recommendation steep* as to the statement J <br /> of the rich and Wildlife life Ber °e OM the 0Ontemplated or <br /> rather possible establishment of a minimum pool for preset.. <br /> flop of fish and wildlife in 0sddea Reservoir, the ospasity <br /> Of that minimum pool being 10,€00 acre feat. <br /> Your Committee felt that not having reeeived any <br /> definite information as to any &cotton by the Corps of agineers„ <br /> pursuant to the hearing at Lamar, on November 8, 1946, eons» <br /> using the same situation, there was at this tine nothing on <br /> vhjth the Commission could aot, but that if and when any <br /> definite anti= was taken, the Commission should give the <br /> natter consideration and decide on a plan of notion **seeming <br /> it. <br /> In that connection, the attention of your Committee <br /> was called to Publlo Law 732, 79th Congress, approved August <br /> 14,, 1944, amending the Act of Naroh 10, 1934, entitled 'An <br /> Act to promote the conservation of wildlife, fish and game, <br /> and for other purposes. ' <br /> Tour Committee recommends that if and when definite <br /> aption is taken with reference to the situation of establish. <br />