Laserfiche WebLink
b. The Applicant must be held to strict proof that the amounts claimed are <br /> based upon use of the structures. <br /> c. The Applicant must be held to strict proof as to its claim that it been <br /> diligent in the continued use and development of its conditional water rights. <br /> d. The Applicant must be held to strict proof that it has put the water to <br /> beneficial use as claimed in the application <br /> e. The application does not present sufficient information to evaluate fully <br /> whether a decree may be entered. <br /> f. Applicant should be held to strict proof as to all of the elements that must <br /> be established in order to obtain the ruling and decree of the court that it seeks. <br /> 4. The CWCB is unable to determine from the application whether additional <br /> grounds for opposition exist, and therefore reserves the right to assert other grounds for <br /> opposition as they become known. <br /> 5. This statement of opposition is continuing in nature and is intended to apply to <br /> any and all future amendments to the original application. <br /> DATED this 29th day of August, 2008. <br /> JOHN W. SUTHERS <br /> Attorney General <br /> E-filed pursuant to C.R.C.P. 121. Duly signed <br /> original <br /> on file at the Office of the Attorney General. <br /> /s/Susan J. Schneider <br /> SUSAN J. SCHNEIDER*, 19961 <br /> First Assistant Attorney General <br /> Natural Resources and Environment Section <br /> Attorneys for the Colorado Water Conservation <br /> Board <br /> *Counsel of Record <br /> CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE <br /> This is to certify that on the 29th day of August,2008,I caused a true and correct copy of <br /> the foregoing STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION to be served electronically via LexisNexis File& <br /> Serve to each of the following: <br /> Active <br /> Show -Case Parties <br />