My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
South Platte River Division 1 Longmont RCID 1-10CW299 Statement of Opposition
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
South Platte River Division 1 Longmont RCID 1-10CW299 Statement of Opposition
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2014 3:19:41 PM
Creation date
11/7/2014 2:40:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
1-10CW299
Description
Statement of Opposition
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
2/25/2011
Author
Susan Schneider First Assistant Attorney General
Title
Statement of Opposition Longmont RICD
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Court Documents
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION 1 <br /> COLORADO <br /> 901 9th Avenue <br /> P.O. Box 2038 <br /> Greeley, CO 80631 <br /> Concerning The Application For Water Rights Of: <br /> THE CITY OF LONGMONT, <br /> IN BOULDER COUNTY, COLORADO. <br /> COURT USE ONLY <br /> On behalf of the Colorado Water Conservation Board Case No.: 10CW299 <br /> JOHN W. SUTHERS, Attorney General <br /> SUSAN J. SCHNEIDER * Div.: 1 <br /> First Assistant Attorney General <br /> 1525 Sherman Street, 5th Floor <br /> Denver, CO 80203 <br /> (303) 866-5046 <br /> Registration Number: 19961 <br /> susan.schneider@state.co.us <br /> state.co.us <br /> *Counsel of Record <br /> STATEMENT OF OPPOSITION <br /> 1. Name of objector: Colorado Water Conservation Board ("CWCB") <br /> Mailing address: 1313 Sherman Street, Room 721 <br /> Denver, CO 80203 <br /> 2. Name of ditch or structure: As more fully described in the application. <br /> 3. State facts why application for water rights should not be granted or why it should <br /> be granted only in part or on certain conditions: <br /> a. The CWCB is concerned whether Applicant has properly performed its <br /> diligence for its conditional Recreational In-Channel Diversion (" RICD") decreed in <br /> Case No. 01CW275-1. <br /> b. Applicant's improper due diligence on this conditional RICD may affect <br /> Colorado's ability to promote maximum utilization of the waters of the state. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.