My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Pagosa Springs San Juan/Delores River Div 7 Response Letter
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
7001-8000
>
Pagosa Springs San Juan/Delores River Div 7 Response Letter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2014 12:00:03 PM
Creation date
10/27/2014 11:54:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
Description
Dave Rosgen respone letter on the San Juan River in Pagosa Springs, CO
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
1/1/2007
Author
Dave Rosgen
Title
Pagosa Springs WWP, San Juan/Delores Division 7 Dave Rosgen's response letter
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Correspondence
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7 <br /> boating "wave"due to sediment transport requirements. Increasing the width/depth ratio is <br /> contrary to our"C"and "F"stream type restoration and enhancement work. <br /> The Lacy report goes on to say that"the W-weir is inappropriate for in-stream use in populated <br /> areas." The basis for this statement is totally unfounded. The statement that"they require <br /> extensive maintenance" is totally wrong! And the statement in the Lacy report that the W-weirs <br /> have "unpredictable flow characteristics"proves that they have not done their homework. The <br /> vertical velocity profiles, measured isovels and channel re-surveys, bank erosion measurements, <br /> near-bank stress calculations and other scientific data collected, analyzed and published provides <br /> a basis to counter their claims. What measurements were taken or what research was conducted <br /> to support the strong statements contained in their report? I see none! <br /> From a fish habitat standpoint,I would highly doubt if any fish biologist would favor installing a <br /> low-head concreted boulder check dams(U-drops)and replace vegetated banks with boulder rip <br /> rap, compared to the physical and biological function of W-weirs. There are many fish <br /> population studies associated with W-weirs in Colorado;the reader can be directed to obtain <br /> additional information, should that be necessary(Contact the Montrose office of the Colorado <br /> Division of Wildlife for data on W-weirs in the Uncompahgre and Lake Fork of the Gunnison <br /> Fishery Studies). <br /> I appreciate peer review in science,but it has to be responsible and credible. This report is <br /> irresponsible and non-credible as their conclusions are based on biased,unscientific and <br /> unsupported findings. The statements presented in the report are basically a post-action <br /> justification of their replacement of a W-weir in downtown Pagosa Springs on the San Juan <br /> River, in favor of a design developed by "Recreation and Engineering and Planning"consultants, <br /> with very limited"river restoration"objectives. <br /> Dave Rosgen,P.1-I., Ph.D <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.