Laserfiche WebLink
The dam safety and operational issues described above combined with the value of the reservoir for <br /> optimizing water use for multiple stakeholders in the basin have driven the District to move <br /> forward with the rehabilitation of the Rio Grande Dam and Reservoir.The District is a proponent of <br /> the Rio Grande Cooperative Project where the District works with multiple stakeholders in the <br /> State,primarily the Colorado Water Conservation Board and the Colorado Division of Parks and <br /> Wildlife to restore the full use of the reservoir. The project is made up of final design, <br /> program/project management and three primary construction components that address structural <br /> and/or operational deficiencies of the Reservoir,as described below: <br /> Final Design <br /> The rehabilitation of Rio Grande Reservoir requires that the proposed improvements be designed, <br /> managed,and inspected by a professional registered engineer in the State of Colorado. The <br /> engineering firm selected to conduct this work will provide overall project management,surveying, <br /> geotechnical exploration,geotechnical and hydraulic analysis,and the final design of the spillway, <br /> clay blanket liner,bypass tunnel and outlet works. The engineering firm will also provide cost <br /> estimating,QA/QC for the project,respond to State Engineer comments and assist will bidding and <br /> award for the project. This work is currently being conducted by SLVID under Contract <br /> C154210 at a cost of$1,256,134,under its sub-consultant-Deer and Ault Consultants. <br /> Program/Project Management <br /> The Rio Grande Cooperative Project involves the coordination and management of many different <br /> project components. Some of key project management issues that need to be addressed prior to <br /> the SLVID proceeding forward with construction,are 1)successful negotiation,feasibility analysis <br /> and exchange of land between the Forest Service and the SLVID, 2)storage accounts and operation <br /> modeling,3)execution of storage agreements,and 4)overall stakeholder coordination and program <br /> management. The successful management of these key issues is vital to the overall success of the <br /> Project. <br /> Primary Construction Components <br /> 1.)Upstream Clay Blanket-In order to reduce seepage through the rock slide formation at the left <br /> dam abutment,a clay blanket slope liner will be installed on the upstream side of the dam at the left <br /> abutment.The clay blanket,shown on Figure 1 in plan and Figure 2 in cross-section,will be a <br /> zoned fill placed over the rock slide and extending across the west abutment of the dam <br /> approximately 100 feet.The zones include a filter layer,low permeability clay core,and cover zone. <br /> This improvement is expected to substantially reduce seepage and allow full storage capability of <br /> the reservoir to be achieved. Clay liner materials will be obtained by borrowing and processing <br /> approximately 20,000 cubic yards of soil and rock material from reservoir property.These areas <br /> are described in Figure 1. Processing shall consist of screening various gradations from the existing <br /> landslide deposit,as described in Exhibit 1. The clay liner material for the construction <br /> component described above is currently being conducted under Contract C154213,under its <br /> sub-consultant-Brad Moore,at a cost of$295,699.66. <br /> 2.)Low Level Outlet-The existing low level outlet will be replaced with a hollow jet valve <br /> discharge structure at the downstream side of the dam.The existing low level outlet tunnel will <br /> continue to be used to provide conveyance between the upstream and downstream portals.The <br /> existing sluice gate control structure will either be demolished or abandoned in-place with a bypass <br /> tunnel providing conveyance around the structure;this is shown on Figure 1.Schedule constraints <br /> for the work and the uncertainty of the demolition costs (for removal of existing sluice gate control <br /> structure)suggest that the construction bidding process may be the best way to determine the <br /> 2 <br />