My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Memorandum Agenda Item 11e 05/15/2000
CWCB
>
Chatfield Mitigation
>
Board Meetings
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
Memorandum Agenda Item 11e 05/15/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2014 2:25:16 PM
Creation date
9/23/2014 2:25:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Board Meetings
Board Meeting Date
5/15/2000
Description
Agenda Item 11e May 22-23, 2000 Board Meeting Alamosa River Watershed Project
Board Meetings - Doc Type
Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
L<B>and</B> <B>mine</B> Page 13 of 20 <br /> Friedland made similar remarks in a private meeting with mine regulators, <br /> who decided not to seek closure of the mine. <br /> 40 <br /> Anne Baldridge, the mine inspector assigned to Summitville, said in a <br /> deposition that there was some sentiment to close the mine. But the leak <br /> didn't seem great initially, and Friedland seemed willing to deal with it. <br /> And like the Bank of America, regulators were not eager to inherit the mine. <br /> "Quite frankly, the division did not have the resources to take over the <br /> project and to deal with this problem," Baldridge said. "And I think there was <br /> a concern that if the mine got shut down, the operator just might say, 'OK, <br /> we're out of here,'and the division would be left holding the bag." <br /> Galactic had been required to post a bond when mining began. But it was <br /> only$1.3 million, far less than the cost of cleaning up the growing mess. <br /> With little alternative, the board did nothing to halt mining, deciding only to <br /> fine the company$3,600 for allowing mud to wash into the creeks. <br /> In the months before the cyanide leaks, the mud had been the chief concern <br /> of regulators. Hay bales had been used to try to halt mudslides from the <br /> denuded hills. <br /> Baldridge said the general sloppiness of the site worried her during an initial <br /> visit the summer before construction began. Mud was everywhere, with tree <br /> branches sticking out of the mud and topsoil on top of trees. <br /> "There's a lot to be said for housekeeping and the way a site visually looks, <br /> in terms of how careful an operator is going to be,"she said. "My first <br /> • <br /> impressions ... were that this does not look like the operator is going to be <br /> that careful." <br /> After the winter construction, the place looked worse, Baldridge said. <br /> Some of it was cleaned up after Galactic hired an environmental coordinator <br /> for the site, Baldridge said. <br /> Friedland's promise to engineer a Space Age solution to the cyanide leak <br /> turned into talk about building a treatment plant so the polluted water could <br /> be legally discharged. <br /> But that plan wasn't pursued aggressively. <br /> "We didn't have money,"said Leonard. <br /> So workers continued to pump the polluted groundwater back into the pool <br /> of cyanide solution. <br /> When the pumps failed, cyanide escaped into the creeks. <br /> At least eight spills occurred in 1987. <br /> But by that time, the state mining division was in no position to regulate <br /> Summitville—or anything else. In a dispute having nothing to do with <br /> Summitville, the Colorado legislature cut all funds to the agency as of July 1, <br /> 1987. <br /> • <br /> The money was restored later in the year, but demoralized regulators had <br /> http://www.denver-rmn.com/news/0507smmtl.shtml 5/7/00 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.