Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> STATE OF COLORADO <br /> • CONSF�, <br /> Colorado Water Conservation Board cozo Lq,, <br /> Department of Natural Resources !- 11 'y� <br /> 1313 Sherman Street,Room 721 5001- �R AF <br /> Denver,Colorado 80203 o <br /> Phone:(303)866-3441 r876 <br /> FAX:(303)866-4474 ' /9 3'1 '4 <br /> www.cwcb.state.co.us <br /> Bill Owens <br /> MEMORANDUM Governor <br /> Russell George <br /> Executive Director <br /> To: Colorado Water Conservation Board <br /> Rod Kuharich <br /> Finance Committee CWCB Director <br /> From Ted Kowalski Dan McAuliffe <br /> Deputy Director <br /> Date: August 31, 2006 <br /> Re: CWCB Finance Committee Meeting <br /> Water Supply Planning and Finance—Non Reimbursable Projects <br /> CWCB Recreational and Environmental Instream Flows Study <br /> 4 Background <br /> Colorado has been at the forefront of instream flow water rights since 1973, when the General Assembly <br /> recognized that the CWCB should be able to appropriate instream flow water rights for a beneficial use <br /> within Colorado. Then, in the past decade, Recreational In-Channel Diversion ("RICD") water rights <br /> have been recognized and appropriated by a number of different local governmental entities. There have <br /> been disagreements over quantifying RICDs and over the extent to which these types of water rights <br /> provide economic benefits to the surrounding communities. Through the Statewide Water Supply <br /> Initiative ("SWSI") and the 1177 basin roundtables,it is becoming apparent that recreation and <br /> environmental instream uses hold value to individual communities and the state as a whole. Yet,there <br /> are vastly different economic values put on these types of instream uses of water, and there are vastly <br /> different methods and results associated with the methods for determining the appropriate flows for <br /> these types of uses. The total funding this study would be fore $150,000 per year. <br /> Objective <br /> This study would have the following objectives: 1)to analyze how instream flow water rights (ISFs and <br /> RICDs)have affected, and will affect in the future,water management in Colorado; 2)to provide an <br /> objective analysis of the different quantification methods; and, 3) to determine the true economic <br /> benefits associated with these types of water rights. <br /> Recommendation <br /> Staff recommends that the Board request the General Assembly to authorize an appropriation which will <br /> be appropriated from the Water Conservation Board Construction Fund for the Recreational and <br /> Environmental Instream Flows Study. <br /> • <br /> Flood Protection•Water Project Planning and Financing•Stream and Lake Protection <br /> Water Supply Protection•Conservation Planning <br />