Laserfiche WebLink
• S <br /> those from HMRs 51 and 55A. This study is following the same procedures used in the recently <br /> completed Nebraska and Ohio statewide PMP studies. A grid has been delineated across the <br /> entire domain. Each storm is then maximized in-place and transpositioned to appropriate grid <br /> point(s) following standard procedures. For locations in the upper reaches of the watershed <br /> where topography plays a significant role in rainfall production and distribution,the effects of <br /> topography(orographic effects) are explicitly calculated using the Orographic Transposition <br /> Factor methodology. All data and calculations will be performed using the PMP Evaluation <br /> Tool to ensure reproducibility and expediency in use of the data and PMP derivation. <br /> Recently Completed Projects <br /> Arizona statewide PMP <br /> This study provided updated PMP values for the entire state of Arizona. These values <br /> have replaced those from HMR 49. This study followed the storm based approach which <br /> analyzes the most extreme rainfall events over the entire period of record in all regions <br /> considered transpositionable to any point within the state. Because HMR 49 is so outdated and <br /> did not analyze storms using the current methodology followed in all other current HMRs, a <br /> large number of storms required a full storm analysis. The 51 new storms analyzed as part of <br /> this study provided an immense database of storm information for use in PMP development and <br /> other hydrologic evaluations. Each storm was maximized in-place and transpositioned to <br /> appropriate locations using a 2.5-square mile grid (over 64,000 grid points in total) covering all <br /> of Arizona and surrounding regions. During the transposition process,the horizontal difference <br /> in moisture were calculated and the effects of topography(orographic effects)were explicitly <br /> calculated using the Orographic Transposition Factor methodology. In order to process and store <br /> this large amount of data and large number of calculations,the PMP Evaluation Tool was <br /> developed. Calculating the PMP values using the PMP Evaluation Tool provided for <br /> reproducibility and expediency in use of the data and PMP derivation. Data and analysis from <br /> this study are directly useable for work in this EPAT evaluation and any future PMP work in the <br /> state of Colorado. <br /> Lewis River site-specific PMP <br /> This study provided updated PMP values for a large watershed in the southern Cascade <br /> Mountains of Washington where topography played a major role in PMP development. These <br /> values replaced those from HMR 57. This study followed the same procedures used in the <br /> recently completed Arizona statewide PMP study. This was a storm based approach which <br /> analyzes the most extreme rainfall events over the entire period of record in all regions <br /> considered transpositionable to any point within the basin. Each storm was then maximized in- <br /> place and transpositioned to a set of grid points covering the basin at a 2.5-square mile <br /> resolution. During the transposition process,the horizontal difference in moisture were <br /> calculated and the effects of topography(orographic effects)were explicitly quantified using the <br /> Orographic Transposition Factor methodology. The PMP values for this basin were the result of <br /> Atmospheric River storm events producing large amounts of rainfall on top of antecedent snow <br /> pack from the fall through spring seasons. Appropriate meteorological time series data for use in <br /> snow melt calculations were determined and applied for the PMP/PMF. Techniques and <br /> understanding of mountainous topography on rainfall and PMP gained from this study are <br /> directly useable for work in this EPAT review as well as future PMP work in the state of <br /> Colorado. <br /> Nebraska statewide PMP <br />