Laserfiche WebLink
. I <br /> 6. Overall evaluation of the end-to-end application of EPAT. Evaluation of each <br /> component of EPAT is important and required but the integrated final product created <br /> by the combined components must be evaluated. This evaluation requires a <br /> comprehensive understanding of the purpose of EPAT and the use of the EPAT <br /> results. Given the precision and processing of the input(e.g. historic storm rainfall <br /> analyses),precise application of procedures (e.g. inflow moisture vector translation), <br /> adjusted storm rainfall analyses (e.g. identification of maximum rainfall by area size <br /> and duration), and results presentation (e.g. gridded vs basin average rainfall), a <br /> critical evaluation of the overall performance <br /> of EPAT needs to be <br /> provided. <br /> Company Background <br /> Applied Weather Associates, LLC (AWA) is a veteran owned small business located in <br /> Monument, Colorado, established in 1996. AWA specializes in regional, statewide, and site- <br /> specific Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) studies and precipitation analysis. AWA excels <br /> in developing applications designed to provide solutions using advanced hydrometeorological <br /> analyses. We provide quality high-resolution meteorological analyses and data for use in <br /> hydrologic model calibration and validation, and forensic meteorology. Our team employs <br /> expert analyses, innovative approaches, and state-of-the-science technology to provide clients <br /> with consistently reliable products accepted by both state and federal regulators. AWA operates <br /> with integrity and strives to build and maintain strong relationships with each of our clients, <br /> partners, and community. PMP studies and precipitation analyses have been accepted by state <br /> and national dam regulatory agencies including the Colorado SEO DSB, Federal Energy <br /> Regulatory Commission(FERC), and Natural Resources Conservation Service(NRCS). <br /> AWA is the leader in providing advanced techniques for implementing site-specific and <br /> statewide PMP procedures. AWA has completed a comprehensive review of the Storm <br /> Separation Method(SSM)used in HMRs 55A, 57 and 59 to address orographic influences on <br /> rainfall. The SSM was found to be highly subjective and not reproducible. Historic storm <br /> rainfall data are not used in a consistent nor objective manner. In addition, AWA has performed <br /> extensive evaluations and verification of procedures used in HMR 49. Many of these procedures <br /> were shown to be inadequate and inappropriate for proper PMP determination. None of the <br /> primary procedures used in HMR 49 have been used in subsequent HMRs. Therefore, any PMP <br /> development process which utilizes these procedures and methods will produce inaccurate and <br /> unreliable results. <br /> In order to address these shortcomings,AWA developed the Orographic Transposition Factor <br /> (OTF)to address orographic effects on rainfall in a consistent, objective and reproducible <br /> manner. The OTF was used in the statewide study for Arizona and is being used in Wyoming. <br /> AWA developed the PMP Evaluation Tool to handle the immense amount of data and storm <br /> analyses needed to derive PMP in the Arizona statewide PMP study. State-of-the-science <br /> protocols and GIS applications were efficiently used to produce the GIS based tool. Both the <br /> development of procedures to properly address the meteorological aspects of extreme rainfall in <br /> Arizona and GIS application of those procedures were reviewed by an independent Review <br /> Board consisting of meteorologists and hydrologists as well as by GIS specialists in the Arizona <br /> Department of Water Resources and Flood Control District of Maricopa County. AWA has been <br /> commended by the Arizona DWR for this GIS development effort and the PMP values produced <br /> by the PMP Evaluation Tool are now being used for PMF and other hydrologic applications in <br /> Arizona instead of HMR 49. In addition,the PMP Evaluation Tool is currently being used in the <br />