My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Report of State Auditor 1998
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
Report of State Auditor 1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2014 10:27:36 AM
Creation date
6/4/2014 9:41:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1998
Title
Report of the State Auditor
CWCB Section
Finance
Description
Colorado Water Conservation Board Construction Fund Loan Program Department of Natural Resources Performance Audit 1998
Publications - Doc Type
Tech Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> Report of The Colorado State Auditor 37 <br /> because the Board believed that assets of a more liquid nature (e.g., certificates of <br /> deposit that could be easily converted to cash) offered them a better guaranty if the <br /> borrower defaulted. <br /> The Collateral Obtained for Individual <br /> Loans Varies <br /> As shown above,the Board's collateral policies and practices allow for a great deal <br /> of discretion when the Board makes a decision regarding the collateral that will be <br /> required to secure a particular project loan. For example, policy and practice allow <br /> the Board to accept anything from a certificate of deposit for one loan payment to a <br /> deed of trust for the project itself. Further, policy and practice allow the Board to <br /> require a borrower to provide collateral that consists of a single asset(e.g.,a deed of <br /> trust to the project property) or a combination of assets (e.g., a certificate of deposit <br /> for one loan payment and security interest in a revenue stream). <br /> To determine how the Board was applying both the written collateral policy and its <br /> stated practice for obtaining collateral, we reviewed the collateral pledged for <br /> 28 loans for projects that were completed in Fiscal Years 1997 and 1998. The loans <br /> for these projects totaled about $14.5 million. Collateral for 19 of the 28 loans <br /> (68 percent) consisted of a certificate of deposit and security interest in a revenue <br /> stream, which followed the Board's stated practice for obtaining collateral. In the <br /> remaining nine cases, the collateral obtained did not follow the Board's stated <br /> practice, although it did conform with the Board's collateral policy. Collateral for <br /> these nine loans consisted of the following: <br /> • Deeds of trust for property and pledge of interest in a revenue stream (four <br /> cases). <br /> • Pledges of water rights and an interest in a revenue stream(two cases). <br /> • Security interests in a combination of various assets (e.g., water rights, <br /> property and other assets) (one case). <br /> • Assignment of the proceeds from a contract with another entity and a pledge <br /> of interest in a revenue stream(one case). <br /> • Certificate of deposit, pledge of interest in a revenue stream, and a deed of <br /> trust for property(one case). <br /> Variation in the amount and type of collateral that is obtained from a borrower is <br /> expected and,to a certain extent,necessary. This is because different borrowers have <br /> different assets available to them to pledge for security for a loan. Further, the <br /> amount and type of collateral pledged for a loan should vary depending upon a <br /> borrower's credit history and other measures of the relative risk that the loan will not <br /> • <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.