My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Report of State Auditor 1998
CWCB
>
Publications
>
DayForward
>
Report of State Auditor 1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2014 10:27:36 AM
Creation date
6/4/2014 9:41:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1998
Title
Report of the State Auditor
CWCB Section
Finance
Description
Colorado Water Conservation Board Construction Fund Loan Program Department of Natural Resources Performance Audit 1998
Publications - Doc Type
Tech Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br /> IReport of The Colorado State Auditor 21 <br /> I <br /> Recommendation No. 3: <br /> IThe Water Conservation Board should require applicants to provide evidence that <br /> I they have explored other means of financing before approving the use of <br /> Construction Fund monies for a project. <br /> Water Conservation Board Response: <br /> Agree. The CWCB staff will insist upon evidence that applicants have <br /> j explored other sources of funding in every loan application considered by the. <br /> Board beginning immediately. The use of this information is expected to <br /> raise implementation issues that deserve further consideration by the Board <br /> Iand interested constituencies (e.g., what is the right balance between a <br /> borrower's need for state assistance and the assurance of timely repayment?). <br /> There is no statutory requirement that the CWCB be a lender of last resort, <br /> although the statutes do provide that all other means of financing shall be <br /> thoroughly explored before use is made of fund moneys [37-60-121(b) (V), <br /> IC.R.S.]. In order to protect the long-term integrity of the Construction Fund, <br /> the Board tries to maintain a balance between the more risky loans for <br /> I borrowers that would not otherwise be able to borrow enough money to <br /> develop an adequate water supply, and investments in the more financially <br /> sound borrowers. In setting priorities, the Board's policy has been to give <br /> I preference to projects that include other funding sources. Requiring the Fund <br /> to function only as a"lender of last resort" could undermine its integrity. <br /> Water Projects May Not Be Consistent <br /> I With Statutory Requirements <br /> 1 We found that projects have been funded that may not be consistent with statutes <br /> governing the use of the Fund. The statutory spending priorities are: <br /> I • The first priority goes to projects which will increase the beneficial <br /> consumptive use of Colorado's undeveloped compact-entitled waters. This <br /> is water that falls under one of the interstate river compact agreements. <br /> IThese agreements allocate water among Colorado and other downstream <br /> I <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.