Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> 4 Evaluation of Actions Taken on Colorado Water Conservation Board as of December 1999 I <br /> Program improvements to interested parties, including the members of the Legislative Audit 1 <br /> Committee. <br /> Water Conservation Board's Report Response I <br /> p P <br /> (September 1998): <br /> I <br /> Agree. The Board has established programmatic goals and objectives for implementation <br /> of its Construction Fund Loan Program responsibilities in its Long Range Plan,and the staff <br /> presents increasingly better information to the Board at its regular meetings regarding <br /> implementation concerns. More extensive management goals and specific operational <br /> objectives will be developed by July 30, 1999, to provide better means to assure that the I <br /> Program is operating within an appropriate framework. These new goals and objectives will II <br /> be presented to the Board based upon: 1) the review of workload allocation and priorities <br /> that is in progress within the agency,and 2)the comparison of the CWCB program structure I <br /> with other state agencies with similar programmatic responsibilities. <br /> Implementation Date: July 1999. 1 <br /> Water Conservation Board's Update (October 1999): <br /> I <br /> In progress. The Construction Fund Program goals and objectives are outlined in the CWCB <br /> Long Range Plan that is revised periodically. The Program has developed a mission <br /> statement and individual performance objectives for each employee that follow the overall <br /> goals of the Program and are in line with the Colorado Peak Performance Program <br /> objectives. The CWCB staff delivers progress reports of program improvements at every <br /> I <br /> CWCB Board meeting and regularly to the Colorado Water Congress and the Colorado <br /> Water Resource and Power Development Authority. <br /> I <br /> Office of the State Auditor's Evaluation of Actions Taken <br /> (December 1999): <br /> 1 <br /> In progress. We noted that the Board has recently made some progress in establishing <br /> shorter-term performance objectives for the Construction Loan Program. In its Fiscal Year <br /> 2001 budget request,for example,the Board reported on several new performance measures <br /> of a process-related nature (e.g., number of feasibility studies completed and reviewed, <br /> number of loan applications received and reviewed, and number of loans approved). <br /> Although formulating and reporting on these measures represents progress toward <br /> implementing the audit recommendation, further improvements are still possible. For <br /> example, the Board has not created any goals or objectives to illustrate its performance in I <br /> certain business-related areas which are fundamental to the overall success of the Program <br /> I <br /> I <br />