Laserfiche WebLink
Report of The Colorado State Auditor 15 <br /> Although the policy was not effective until October 1999, we reviewed the eight projects <br /> authorized by the General Assembly in Fiscal Year 1999 to determine if the Board had <br /> discontinued its practice of authorizing projects before a completed feasibility study was <br /> received. We found that seven of the eight projects did have a completed feasibility study <br /> before authorization. The remaining project's authorization was contingent upon the <br /> j completion of the feasibility study. We also found that in all cases project sponsors provided <br /> the information required by the Guidelines and that this information was sufficient to assess <br /> the project's benefit and the applicant's ability to pay its loan obligations. <br /> Identify and Begin Collection of Payable Feasibility Study Loans <br /> In order to encourage entities to undertake water projects,the Board sometimes loans entities money <br /> for the purpose of conducting a feasibility study. Prior to 1993, contracts required entities that <br /> received feasibility study loans to pay them back if the project was started within ten years. If the <br /> project did not begin within the ten years, repayment was not required. At the time of the 1998 <br /> audit,we identified seven cases where the Board had no information about whether feasibility study <br /> loan recipients had started their projects and an eighth case where repayment of a$42,000 feasibility <br /> study loan should have begun in 1996, but no payments had ever been requested or received. <br /> ( : <br /> 7 (September 1998 <br /> Recommendation No. p ) <br /> The Water Conservation Board should identify all feasibility study loans made before 1993 in order <br /> to determine whether these loans are payable under the ten-year clause or whether the loan has <br /> attained grant status. If payable loans are identified, the Board should contact the borrowers to <br /> inform them of the obligation and make every effort to collect the amount due plus interest, if <br /> possible. <br /> Water Conservation Board's Report Response <br /> r (September 1998): <br /> Agree. This process is in progress and the CWCB staff will identify and initiate collection <br /> of any unpaid obligations by June 30, 1999. <br /> This requires not only that CWCB staff determine whether the project was constructed but <br /> also whether the funding agreement provides for the collection of interest. Some feasibility <br /> studies included more than one project,which will make it difficult to establish the amount <br /> of the repayment if some of the projects are not completed. <br /> It may not be feasible to collect interest curing the study period. In most cases prior to 1994, <br /> the Board's policies for implementing tf e Construction Fund Loan Program did not include <br /> I <br />