Gunnison - Lone Cabin Ditch & Reservoir - Dam Rehabilitation_Misc Doc

• Basin Roundtable: Gunnison
• Applicant: Lone Cabin Ditch & Reservoir Company
• Description: Lone Cabin Dam Rehabilitation
• Account Source: Basin
• Board Meeting Date: 1/28/2014
• Contract/PO #: C150529
• WSRA - Doc Type: Supporting Documents

2/19/2A14
e
�TATE OF
CGLORADa
Lone Cabin WSRA Grant
State.co.us E�cutire Branch Mail - Lone Cabin WSRA Grarrt
Godbout - DNR, Craig <[e-mail]> Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:01 AM
To: James Briscoe <[e-mail]>
Cc: Kirk Russell - DNR <[e-mail]>
Jim:
Your WSRA application for Lone Cabin is on the CWCB's January 27-28, 2014 agenda.
I'll use previous application, Scope of Work, Budget and Schedule for Board review. If I need anything else, or
updates, I'll let you know.
Kirk Russell and I have spoken and ha� coordinated our efforts.
t just want to be certain of what the revision is requesting: An increase of Basin Account funds of $83,150, irom
the appro�ed $38,000, to $121,150? Is that correct? (The Water Activity Summary Sheet for the Board's review is
almost complete)
Thanks for your patients.
Craig Godbout
Program Manager
Colorado Water Conservation Board
Water Supply Planning Section
1580 Logan Street, Suite 200
Denver CO 80203
[phone], ext 3210 (office)
[phone] (cell)
craig. godbout@ state. co. us
[e-mail] <[e-mail]>
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]
Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:39 AM
Thanks for your help in getting this lined out. I am attaching a copy of the amended Application that was filed
with the Gunnison Basin Roundtable in October, 2013, and which I thought the CWCB office was provided. It
does only address the request for increased Basin funding to bring the total grant up to 50% of the estimated
cost of the project, with out increasing the grant funding from the State fund.
Not much was changed or added in the amended application. I belie� the changes addressed the fact that Lone
Cabin was only appro�ed for a 25% grant at the September CWCB meeting and identified some additional
engineering expenses that were incurred in the Summer 2013. Since the Gunnison Basin Roundtable had, in
March approved and recommended a 100% grant for the project, it was suggested to us by John McClow, with
Kirk Russell indicating his agreement (following the CWCB decision at the September meeting) that we go back
to the Gunnison Basin Roundtable with a request to increase Basin funds and bring the grant up to 50% of the
estimated cost of the project.
! also hav�e an electronic copy of the Plans and Specifications for the project, prepared by Buckhom Geotech out
https://mail.g oog le.corc✓mai I/?ui=2&ilr5e5e6d73e6&Hev� pt8�q=hotchlavV%40ad.com&q s=true&search=q uery�th=143917cb919aebe8 1/4